What’s new in Hyperledger Fabric v2.x¶
What’s New in Hyperledger Fabric v2.5¶
Purge history of private data¶
While it has always been possible to delete private data from current state, this new feature enables purging the history of private data from a peer while preserving a hash of the private data as immutable evidence on the blockchain.
- Useful for purging private data on demand for privacy reasons or to adhere to government regulations.
- Deletes private data from state and from peer’s private data history so that it can no longer be queried from block events or from other peers.
- Available as a new chaincode API PurgePrivateData().
- Requires setting application capability to V2_5 in channel configuration
For more details, see the Private data topic.
Multi-architecture binaries and docker images are now available¶
The release binaries and docker images have been updated as follows:
- Support for amd64 and arm64.
- Release binaries are statically linked for maximum portability.
- Docker images utilize dynamically linked binaries and are now based on Ubuntu (rather than Alpine) to make them more consistent with typical production runtime environments (production runtime environments are typically based on glibc and often require dynamic linking of HSM modules).
Fabric v2.5.x is the current long-term support (LTS) release. A simple in-place upgrade from the prior LTS (Fabric v2.2.x) release is possible.
What’s New in Hyperledger Fabric v2.4¶
Fabric Gateway is a new service running on peer nodes that manages transaction submission and processing for client applications, with the following benefits:
- Simplifies client applications and SDKs - Your client application can simply delegate transaction submission to a trusted peer. There is no need for your application to open connections to peer nodes and ordering service nodes from other organizations.
- Fabric Gateway manages the collection of transaction endorsements from other organizations and submission to the ordering service on behalf of client applications.
- Fabric Gateway has intelligence to determine what endorsements are required for a given transaction, even if your solution utilizes a combination of chaincode-level endorsement policies, private data collection endorsement policies, and state-based endorsement policies.
New lightweight Gateway SDKs (v1.0.0) are available for Node, Java, and Go. The SDKs support flexible application patterns:
- You can utilize the high-level programming model similar to prior SDK versions, allowing your application to simply call a single SubmitTransaction() function.
- More advanced applications can leverage the gateway’s individual Endorse, Submit, and CommitStatus services for transaction submission, and the Evaluate service for queries.
- You can delegate transaction endorsement entirely to the gateway, or if needed, specify the endorsing organizations and the gateway will utilize a peer from each organization.
For more information, see the Fabric Gateway topic.
Peer node unjoin¶
You can now unjoin a peer from a channel when the channel is no longer needed. All channel resources will be removed from the peer and the peer will no longer process blocks from the channel.
For more details, see the peer node unjoin command reference topic.
Calculate package ID of a packaged chaincode¶
You can calculate the package ID from a packaged chaincode without installing the chaincode on peers using the new peer lifecycle chaincode calculatepackageid command. This command will be useful, for example, in the following scenarios:
- When multiple chaincode packages with the same label name are installed, it is possible to identify which ID corresponds to which package later.
- To check whether a particular chaincode package is installed or not without installing that package.
For more information, see the peer lifecycle chaincode calculatepackageid command reference topic.
What’s New in Hyperledger Fabric v2.3¶
Hyperledger Fabric v2.3 introduces two new features for improved orderer and peer operations.
Orderer channel management without a system channel¶
To simplify the channel creation process and enhance the privacy and scalability of channels, it is now possible to create application channels without first creating a “system channel” managed by the ordering service. This process allows ordering nodes to join (or leave) any number of channels as needed, similar to how peers can participate in multiple channels.
Benefits of the new process:
Increased privacy: Because all ordering nodes used to be joined to the system channel, every ordering node in a network knew about the existence of every channel on that ordering service. Now, an ordering node only knows about the channels it is joined to.
Scalability: When there is a large number of ordering nodes and channels defined on the system channel, it can take a long time for ordering nodes to reach consensus on the membership of all the channels. Now, an ordering service can scale horizontally in a decentralized fashion by independently joining ordering nodes to specific channels.
- Operational benefits
- Simple process to join an ordering node to a channel.
- Ability to list the channels that the ordering node is a consenter on.
- Simple process to remove a channel from an ordering node, which automatically cleans up the blocks associated with that channel.
- Peer organizations do not need to coordinate with an admin of the system channel to create or update its MSP.
For more information, see the Create a channel topic.
It is now possible to take a snapshot of a peer’s channel information, including its state database, and join new peers (in the same organization or different organizations) to the channel based on the snapshot.
Using ledger snapshots has the following advantages:
- Peers don’t need to process all blocks since genesis block: Peers can join a channel without processing all previous blocks since the genesis block, greatly reducing the time it takes to join a peer to an existing channel.
- Peers can join channels using latest channel configuration: Because snapshots include the latest channel configuration, peers can now join a channel using the latest channel configuration. This is especially important if critical channel configuration such as orderer endpoints or TLS CA certificates have been updated since the genesis block.
- Reduced storage costs: Peers that join by snapshot do not incur the storage cost of maintaining all blocks since the genesis block.
- State checkpoints: Peer administrators can snapshot current channel state and compare with other peers, in the same organization or different organizations, to verify the consistency and integrity of the ledger on each peer. Agreed upon snapshots can be used as a checkpoint and basis for newly joining peers.
For more information, see the Taking ledger snapshots and using them to join channels topic.
While Fabric v2.3.0 introduces new features, Fabric v2.2.x remains the current long-term support release until the next LTS release is announced.
What’s New in Hyperledger Fabric v2.0, v2.1, v2.2¶
The first Hyperledger Fabric major release since v1.0, Fabric v2.0 delivers important new features and changes for users and operators alike, including support for new application and privacy patterns, enhanced governance around smart contracts, and new options for operating nodes.
v2.1 and v2.2 build on the v2.0 release with minor features, improvements, and bug fixes, with v2.2 being the first long-term support (LTS) release of Fabric v2.x. Fixes will be provided on the v2.2.x release stream until after the next LTS release is announced.
Let’s take a look at some of the highlights of the Fabric v2.0 release…
Decentralized governance for smart contracts¶
Fabric v2.0 introduces decentralized governance for smart contracts, with a new process for installing a chaincode on your peers and starting it on a channel. The new Fabric chaincode lifecycle allows multiple organizations to come to agreement on the parameters of a chaincode, such as the chaincode endorsement policy, before it can be used to interact with the ledger. The new model offers several improvements over the previous lifecycle:
- Multiple organizations must agree to the parameters of a chaincode: In the release 1.x versions of Fabric, one organization had the ability to set parameters of a chaincode (for instance the endorsement policy) for all other channel members, who only had the power to refuse to install the chaincode and therefore not take part in transactions invoking it. The new Fabric chaincode lifecycle is more flexible since it supports both centralized trust models (such as that of the previous lifecycle model) as well as decentralized models requiring a sufficient number of organizations to agree on an endorsement policy and other details before the chaincode becomes active on a channel.
- More deliberate chaincode upgrade process: In the previous chaincode lifecycle, the upgrade transaction could be issued by a single organization, creating a risk for a channel member that had not yet installed the new chaincode. The new model allows for a chaincode to be upgraded only after a sufficient number of organizations have approved the upgrade.
- Simpler endorsement policy and private data collection updates: Fabric lifecycle allows you to change an endorsement policy or private data collection configuration without having to repackage or reinstall the chaincode. Users can also take advantage of a new default endorsement policy that requires endorsement from a majority of organizations on the channel. This policy is updated automatically when organizations are added or removed from the channel.
- Inspectable chaincode packages: The Fabric lifecycle packages chaincode in easily readable tar files. This makes it easier to inspect the chaincode package and coordinate installation across multiple organizations.
- Start multiple chaincodes on a channel using one package: The previous lifecycle defined each chaincode on the channel using a name and version that was specified when the chaincode package was installed. You can now use a single chaincode package and deploy it multiple times with different names on the same channel or on different channels. For example, if you’d like to track different types of assets in their own ‘copy’ of the chaincode.
- Chaincode packages do not need to be identical across channel members: Organizations can extend a chaincode for their own use case, for example to perform different validations in the interest of their organization. As long as the required number of organizations endorse chaincode transactions with matching results, the transaction will be validated and committed to the ledger. This also allows organizations to individually roll out minor fixes on their own schedules without requiring the entire network to proceed in lock-step.
For existing Fabric deployments, you can continue to use the prior chaincode lifecycle with Fabric v2.x. The new chaincode lifecycle will become effective only when the channel application capability is updated to v2.0. See the Fabric chaincode lifecycle concept topic for an overview of the new chaincode lifecycle.
New chaincode application patterns for collaboration and consensus¶
The same decentralized methods of coming to agreement that underpin the new chaincode lifecycle management can also be used in your own chaincode applications to ensure organizations consent to data transactions before they are committed to the ledger.
- Automated checks: As mentioned above, organizations can add automated checks to chaincode functions to validate additional information before endorsing a transaction proposal.
- Decentralized agreement: Human decisions can be modeled into a chaincode process that spans multiple transactions. The chaincode may require actors from various organizations to indicate their terms and conditions of agreement in a ledger transaction. Then, a final chaincode proposal can verify that the conditions from all the individual transactors are met, and “settle” the business transaction with finality across all channel members. For a concrete example of indicating terms and conditions in private, see the asset transfer scenario in the Private data documentation.
Private data enhancements¶
Fabric v2.0 also enables new patterns for working with and sharing private data, without the requirement of creating private data collections for all combinations of channel members that may want to transact. Specifically, instead of sharing private data within a collection of multiple members, you may want to share private data across collections, where each collection may include a single organization, or perhaps a single organization along with a regulator or auditor.
Several enhancements in Fabric v2.x make these new private data patterns possible:
- Sharing and verifying private data: When private data is shared with a channel member who is not a member of a collection, or shared with another private data collection that contains one or more channel members (by writing a key to that collection), the receiving parties can utilize the GetPrivateDataHash() chaincode API to verify that the private data matches the on-chain hashes that were created from private data in previous transactions.
- Collection-level endorsement policies: Private data collections can now optionally be defined with an endorsement policy that overrides the chaincode-level endorsement policy for keys within the collection. This feature can be used to restrict which organizations can write data to a collection, and is what enables the new chaincode lifecycle and chaincode application patterns mentioned earlier. For example, you may have a chaincode endorsement policy that requires a majority of organizations to endorse, but for any given transaction, you may need two transacting organizations to individually endorse their agreement in their own private data collections.
- Implicit per-organization collections: If you’d like to utilize per-organization private data patterns, you don’t even need to define the collections when deploying chaincode in Fabric v2.x. Implicit organization-specific collections can be used without any upfront definition.
To learn more about the new private data patterns, see the Private data (conceptual documentation). For details about private data collection configuration and implicit collections, see the Private Data (reference documentation).
External chaincode launcher¶
The external chaincode launcher feature empowers operators to build and launch chaincode with the technology of their choice. Use of external builders and launchers is not required as the default behavior builds and runs chaincode in the same manner as prior releases using the Docker API.
- Eliminate Docker daemon dependency: Prior releases of Fabric required peers to have access to a Docker daemon in order to build and launch chaincode - something that may not be desirable in production environments due to the privileges required by the peer process.
- Alternatives to containers: Chaincode is no longer required to be run in Docker containers, and may be executed in the operator’s choice of environment (including containers).
- External builder executables: An operator can provide a set of external builder executables to override how the peer builds and launches chaincode.
- Chaincode as an external service: Traditionally, chaincodes are launched by the peer, and then connect back to the peer. It is now possible to run chaincode as an external service, for example in a Kubernetes pod, which a peer can connect to and utilize for chaincode execution. See Running Chaincode as an External Service for more information.
See External Builders and Launchers to learn more about the external chaincode launcher feature.
State database cache for improved performance on CouchDB¶
- When using external CouchDB state database, read delays during endorsement and validation phases have historically been a performance bottleneck.
- With Fabric v2.0, a new peer cache replaces many of these expensive lookups
with fast local cache reads. The cache size can be configured by using the
Alpine-based docker images¶
Starting with v2.0, Hyperledger Fabric Docker images will use Alpine Linux, a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution. This means that Docker images are now much smaller, providing faster download and startup times, as well as taking up less disk space on host systems. Alpine Linux is designed from the ground up with security in mind, and the minimalist nature of the Alpine distribution greatly reduces the risk of security vulnerabilities.
Sample test network¶
The fabric-samples repository now includes a new Fabric test network. The test network is built to be a modular and user friendly sample Fabric network that makes it easy to test your applications and smart contracts. The network also supports the ability to deploy your network using Certificate Authorities, in addition to cryptogen.
For more information about this network, check out Using the Fabric test network.
Upgrading to Fabric v2.x¶
A major new release brings some additional upgrade considerations. Rest assured though, that rolling upgrades from v1.4.x to v2.0 are supported, so that network components can be upgraded one at a time with no downtime. You can also upgrade directly from the v1.4.x LTS release to the v2.2.x LTS release or v2.5.x LTS release.
The upgrade docs have been significantly expanded and reworked, and now have a standalone home in the documentation: Upgrading to the latest release. Here you’ll find documentation on Upgrading your components and Updating the capability level of a channel, as well as a specific look at the considerations for upgrading to v2.x, Considerations for getting to v2.x.
The release notes provide more details for users moving to the new release. Specifically, take a look at the changes and deprecations.